Search

Site Title

First blog post

Palmira Antik Tiyatrosu’nun Yıkıldığı Hava Görüntüleriyle Kesinleşti

Rusya Savunma Bakanlığı, Palmira Antik Kenti tiyatrosunda IŞİD tarafından yapılan tahribatın ‘drone’ ile çekilmiş son görüntülerini yayınladı.

palmira-tiyatrosunun-yikildigi-drone-goruntuleriyle-kesinlesti

Görüntülerde taş platformlar üzerine oturtulmuş, 16 adet sütunun üzerinde duran Tetrapylon anıtının büyük oranda tahrip edildiği görülüyor. Tetraplylon, küp şeklinde inşa edilen, dört yüzünün her köşesinde bir kapı bulunan, genellikle dört yol ağızlarına inşa edilen yapılara verilen antik yunan anıtlarının bir tarzı olarak da biliniyor.

palmira-tiyatrosunun-yikildigi-drone-goruntuleriyle-kesinlesti-2

Görüntülerde antik dönemden kalma tiyatronun ön cephesi tamamen yok edildiği ve heykellerden geriye sadece moloz yığınları kaldığı görülüyor. Pazartesi günü Rusya Savunma Bakanlığı tarafından yapılan açıklamada ayrıca Suriye hükümetine ait güçlerin kentin yaklaşık 12 mil yakınında olduğu da kaydedildi.

 

 

 

 

Featured post

Farrakhan Unleashed: Libyan Ambassador Stevens Would Still Be Alive & Unharmed If Gaddafi Was In Power

Photo Credit: AP

In a statement at a townhall meeting Wednesday night, Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan argued that the late U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens would still be alive and unharmed if Muammar Gaddafi were still alive.

Farrakhan said “Gaddafi had an ordered society. Ambassador Stevenson [sic] could go anywhere in Libya and he wouldn’t be harmed when Gaddafi was in power.”  Farrakhan continued, “but when the enemy came then we became divided more-so than ever.”

[ooyala code=”VtMGswNjraKJ2MqE7a3WeTOcUyJP-9Mv”]

 

Ambassador Stevens and three others died in a coordinated Islamist attack on the American Consulate in Libya this month. Farrakhan’s claim adds powerful punctuation to the internal unrest and shock in the wake of the incident. The Obama administration, including the State Department, have been in utter disarray post-attack, conflating storiesmisplacing blame and cursing out reporters. It should also be noted that Farrakhan was a supporter of the late Gaddafi.

Follow Benny on Twitter

Turkiye’nin Guncel Sorunlari ve Cozum Onerileri

Ulkemiz geo jeopolitik konumu gerekse iç ve diş faktorler nedeniyle birçok problemle karşılaşmaktadir.Bu sorunlarin çözümü için oncelikle sorunlar dogru teşhiş edilmeli ki doğru tedavi uygulanabilsin.

Sorunlar

1-Abd destekli SDF şemsiye altindaki Pkk/PYD ve bir başka PKK olan Barzani’ye bağlı KDP terror unsurlarinin Irak ve Suriye’nin toprak bütünlüğünü tehdit eder şekilde bir referandumla Kurdistan kurmak istemeleri tabiki bu sadece bir devlet kurma talebinden ibaret degildir

 

Siyonist Kurdistan projesini Sydney Universti’den Tim Anderson su sekilde aciklamisti

Foundation of second #US #Uk and #Israel puppet state so called #Kurdistan for security of Zionist terror regime
https://t.co/oEVjPfDmud

 

 

Kaynakça

http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/amp/yazarlar/murat-yetkin/rusya-da-pyd-dedi-40544463

https://www.democracynow.org/2014/10/22/in_un_speech_noam_chomsky_blasts

THE COVERT ORIGINS OF ISIS Evidence exposing who put ISIS in power, and how it was done.

The Islamic militant group ISIS, formerly known as Al-Qaeda in Iraq, and recently rebranded as the so called Islamic State, is the stuff of nightmares. They are ruthless, fanatical, killers, on a mission, and that mission is to wipe out anyone and everyone, from any religion or belief system and to impose Shari’ah law. The mass executions, beheadings and even crucifixions that they are committing as they work towards this goal are flaunted like badges of pride, video taped and uploaded for the whole world to see. This is the new face of evil.

Would it interest you to know who helped these psychopaths rise to power? Would it interest you to know who armed them, funded them and trained them? Would it interest you to know why?

This story makes more sense if we start in the middle, so we’ll begin with the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011.

The Libyan revolution was Obama’s first major foreign intervention. It was portrayed as an extension of the Arab Spring, and NATO involvement was framed in humanitarian terms.

The fact that the CIA was actively working to help the Libyan rebels topple Gaddafi was no secret, nor were the airstrikes that Obama ordered against the Libyan government. However, little was said about the identity or the ideological leanings of these Libyan rebels. Not surprising, considering the fact that the leader of the Libyan rebels later admitted that his fighters included Al-Qaeda linked jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq.

These jihadist militants from Iraq were part of what national security analysts commonly referred to as Al-Qaeda in Iraq. Remember Al-Qaeda in Iraq was ISIS before it was rebranded.

With the assistance of U.S. and NATO intelligence and air support, the Libyan rebels captured Gaddafi and summarily executed him in the street, all the while enthusiastically chanting “Allah Akbar”. For many of those who had bought the official line about how these rebels were freedom fighters aiming to establish a liberal democracy in Libya, this was the beginning of the end of their illusions.

Prior to the U.S. and NATO backed intervention, Libya had the highest standard of living of any country in Africa. This according to the U.N.’s Human Development Index rankings for 2010. However in the years following the coup, the country descended into chaos, with extremism and violence running rampant. Libya is now widely regarded as failed state (of course those who were naive enough to buy into the propaganda leading up to the war get defensive when this is said).

Now after Gaddafi was overthrown, the Libyan armories were looted, and massive quantities of weapons were sent by the Libyan rebels to Syria. The weapons, which included anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles were smuggled into Syria through Turkey, a NATO ally. The times of London reported on the arrival of the shipmenton September 14th, 2012. (Secondary confirmation in this NYT article) This was just three days after Ambassador Chris Stevens was killed by the attack on the U.S. embassy in Benghazi. Chris Stevens had served as the U.S. government’s liaison to the Libyan rebels since April of 2011.

While a great deal media attention has focused on the fact that the State Department did not provide adequate security at the consulate, and was slow to send assistance when the attack started, Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh released an article in April of 2014 which exposed a classified agreement between the CIA, Turkey and the Syrian rebels to create what was referred to as a “rat line”. The “rat line” was covert network used to channel weapons and ammunition from Libya, through southern turkey and across the Syrian border. Funding was provided by Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

With Stevens dead any direct U.S. involvement in that arms shipment was buried, and Washington would continue to claim that they had not sent heavy weaponry into Syria.

It was at this time that jihadist fighters from Libya began flooding into Syria as well. And not just low level militants. Many were experienced commanders who had fought in multiple theaters.

The U.S. and its allies were now fully focused on taking down Assad’s government in Syria. As in Libya this regime change was to be framed in terms of human rights, and now overt support began to supplement the backdoor channels. The growing jihadist presence was swept under the rug and covered up.

However as the rebels gained strength, the reports of war crimes and atrocities that they were committing began to create a bit of a public relations problem for Washington. It then became standard policy to insist that U.S. support was only being given to what they referred to as “moderate” rebel forces.

This distinction, however, had no basis in reality.

In an interview given in April of 2014, FSA commander Jamal Maarouf admitted that his fighters regularly conduct joint operations with Al-Nusra. Al-Nusra is the official Al-Qa’ida branch in Syria. This statement is further validated by an interview given in June of 2013 by Colonel Abdel Basset Al-Tawil, commander of the FSA’s Northern Front. In this interview he openly discusses his ties with Al-Nusra, and expresses his desire to see Syria ruled by sharia law. (You can verify the identities of these two commanders here in this document from The Institute for the Study of War)

Moderate rebels? Well it’s complicated. Not that this should really come as any surprise. Reuters had reported in 2012 that the FSA’s command was dominated by Islamic extremists, and the New York Times had reported that same year that the majority of the weapons that Washington were sending into Syria was ending up in the hands Jihadists. For two years the U.S. government knew that this was happening, but they kept doing it.

And the FSA’s ties to Al-Nusra are just the beginning. In June of 2014 Al-Nusra merged with ISIS at the border between Iraq and Syria.

So to review, the FSA is working with Al-Nusra, Al-Nusra is working with ISIS, and the U.S. has been sending money and weapons to the FSA even though they’ve known since 2012 that most of these weapons were ending up in the hands of extremists. You do the math.

Syria, we backed I believe, in some cases some of the wrong people and not in the right part of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) that’s a little confusing to people. So I’ve always maintained, and go back quite some time that we were backing the wrong types. I think it’s going to turn out maybe this weekend in a new special that Brett Baer is going to have Friday that’s gonna show some of those weapons from Benghazi ended up in the hands of ISIS. So we helped build ISIS.

In that context, the sarin gas attacks of 2013 which turned out to have been committed by the Syrian rebels, makes a lot more sense doesn’t it? If it wasn’t enough that U.N. investigatorsRussian investigators, and Pulitzer prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh all pinned that crime on Washington’s proxies, the rebels themselves threatened the West that they would expose what really happened if they were not given more advanced weaponry within one month.

By the way, this also explains why Washington then decided to target Russia next.

This threat was made on June 10th, 2013. In what can only be described as an amazing coincidence, just nine days later, the rebels received their first official shipment of heavy weapons in Aleppo.

After the second sarin gas fiasco, which was also exposed and therefore failed to garner public support for airstrikes, the U.S. continued to increase its the training and support for the rebels.

GET THE STORM
IN YOUR INBOX!

In February of 2014, Haaretz reported that the U.S. and its allies in the region, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Israel, were in the process of helping the Syrian rebels plan and prepare for a massive attack in the south. According to Haaretz Israel had also provided direct assistance in military operations against Assad four months prior (you can access a free cached version of the page here).

Then in May of 2014 PBS ran a report in which they interviewed rebels who were trained by the U.S. in Qatar. According to those rebels they were being trained to finish off soldiers who survived attacks.

“They trained us to ambush regime or enemy vehicles and cut off the road,” said the fighter, who is identified only as “Hussein.” “They also trained us on how to attack a vehicle, raid it, retrieve information or weapons and munitions, and how to finish off soldiers still alive after an ambush.”

This is a blatant violation of the Geneva conventions. It also runs contrary to conventional military strategy. In conventional military strategy soldiers are better off left wounded, because this ends up costing the enemy more resources. Executing captured enemy soldiers is the kind of tactic used when you want to strike terror in the hearts of the enemy. It also just happens to be standard operating procedure for ISIS.

One month after this report, in June of 2014, ISIS made its dramatic entry, crossing over the Syrian border into Iraq, capturing Mosul, Baiji and almost reaching Baghdad. The internet was suddenly flooded with footage of drive by shootings, large scale death marches, and mass graves. And of course any Iraqi soldier that was captured was executed.

Massive quantities of American military equipment were seized during that operation. ISIS took entire truckloads of humvees, they took helicopters, tanks, and artillery. They photographed and video taped themselves and advertised what they were doing on social media, and yet for some reason Washington didn’t even TRY to stop them.

U.S. military doctrine clearly calls for the destruction of military equipment and supplies when friendly forces cannot prevent them from falling into enemy hands, but that didn’t happen here. ISIS was allowed to carry this equipment out of Iraq and into Syria unimpeded. The U.S. military had the means to strike these convoys, but they didn’t lift a finger, even though they had been launching drone strikes in Pakistan that same week.

Why would they do that?

Though Obama plays the role of a weak, indecisive, liberal president, and while pundits from the right have had a lot of fun with that image, this is just a facade. Some presidents, like George W. Bush, rely primarily on overt military aggression. Obama gets the same job done, but he prefers covert means. Not really surprising considering the fact that Zbigniew Brzezinski was his mentor.

Those who know their history will remember that Zbigniew Brzezinski was directly involved in the funding and arming the Islamic extremists in Pakistan and Afghanistan in order to weaken the Soviets.

By the way Osama bin Laden was one of these anti-Soviet “freedom fighters” the U.S. was funding and arming.

This operation is no secret at this point, nor are the unintended side effects.

Officially the U.S. government’s arming and funding of the Mujahideen was a response to the Soviet invasion in December of 1979, however in his memoir entitled “From the Shadows” Robert Gates, director of the CIA under Ronald Reagan and George Bush Senior, and Secretary of Defense under both George W. Bush and Barack Obama, revealed that the U.S. actually began the covert operation 6 months prior, with the express intention of luring the Soviets into a quagmire. (You can preview the relevant text here on google books)

The strategy worked. The Soviets invaded, and the ten years of war that followed are considered by many historians as being one of the primary causes of the fall of the USSR.

This example doesn’t just establish precedent, what we’re seeing happen in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria right now is actually a continuation of a old story. Al-Nusra and ISIS are ideological and organizational decedents of these extremist elements that the U.S. government made use of thirty years ago.

The U.S. the went on to create a breeding ground for these extremists by invading Iraq in 2003. Had it not been for the vacuum of power left by the removal and execution of Saddam, Al-Qaeda in Iraq, aka ISIS, would not exist. And had it not been for Washington’s attempt at toppling Assad by arming, funding and training shadowy militant groups in Syria, there is no way that ISIS would have been capable of storming into Iraq in June of 2014.

On every level, no matter how you cut it, ISIS is a product of U.S. government’s twisted and decrepit foreign policy.

Now all of this may seem contradictory to you as you watch the drums of war against ISIS begin to beat louder and the air strikes against them are gradually widened (http://www.wjla.com/articles/2014/08/president-obama-considers-possible-airstrikes-in-syria-against-isil-s-terrorist-army–106516.html). Why would the U.S. help a terrorist organization get established, only to attack them later?

Well why did the CIA put Saddam Hussein in power in 1963?, Why did the U.S. government back Saddam in 1980 when he launched a war of aggression against Iran, even though they knew that he was using chemical weapons? Why did the U.S. fund and arm Islamic extremists in Afghanistan against the Soviets?

There’s a pattern here if you look closely. This is a tried and true geopolitical strategy.

Step 1: Build up a dictator or extremist group which can then be used to wage proxy wars against opponents. During this stage any crimes committed by these proxies are swept under the rug. [Problem]

DID THIS MAKE YOUR BRAIN ITCH?

Step 2: When these nasty characters have outlived their usefulness, that’s when it’s time to pull out all that dirt from under the rug and start publicizing it 24/7. This obviously works best when the public has no idea how these bad guys came to power.[Reaction]

Step 3: Finally, when the public practically begging for the government to do something, a solution is proposed. Usually the solution involves military intervention, the loss of certain liberties, or both. [Solution]

ISIS is extremely useful. They have essentially done Washington dirty work by weakening Assad. In 2014, while the news cycle has focused almost exclusively on Ukraine and Russia, ISIS made major headway in Syria, and as of August they already controlled 35% of the country.

Since ISIS largely based in Syria, this gives the U.S. a pretext to move into Syria. Sooner or later the U.S. will extend the airstrikes into Assad’s backyard, and when they do U.S. officials are already making it clear that both ISIS and the Syrian government will be targeted. That, after all, is the whole point. Washington may allow ISIS to capture a bit more territory first, but the writing is on the wall, and has been for some time now.

The Obama administration has repeatedly insisted that this will never lead to boots on the ground, however, the truth of the matter is that anyone who understands anything about military tactics knows full well that ISIS cannot be defeated by airstrikes alone. In response to airstrikes ISIS will merely disperse and conceal their forces. ISIS isn’t an established state power which can be destroyed by knocking out key government buildings and infrastructure. These are guerrilla fighters who cut their teeth in urban warfare.

To significantly weaken them, the war will have to involve ground troops, but even this is a lost cause. U.S. troops could certainly route ISIS in street to street battles for some time, and they might even succeed in fully occupying Syria and Iraq for a number of years, but eventually they will have to leave, and when they do, it should be obvious what will come next.

The puppets that the U.S. government has installed in the various countries that they have brought down in recent years have without exception proven to be utterly incompetent and corrupt. No one that Washington places in power will be capable of maintaining stability in Syria. Period.

Right now, Assad is the last bastion of stability in the region. He is the last chance they have for a moderate non-sectarian government and he is the only hope of anything even remotely resembling democracy for the foreseeable future. If Assad falls, Islamic extremist will take the helm, they will impose shari’ah law, and they will do everything in their power to continue spreading their ideology as far and wide as they can.

If the world truly wants to stop ISIS, there is only one way to do it:

  1. First and foremost, the U.S. government and its allies must be heavily pressured to cut all support to the rebels who are attempting to topple Assad. Even if these rebels that the U.S. is arming and funding were moderate, and they’re not, the fact that they are forcing Assad to fight a war on multiple fronts, only strengthens ISIS. This is lunacy.
  2. The Syrian government should be provided with financial support, equipment, training and intelligence to enable them to turn the tide against ISIS. This is their territory, they should be the ones to reclaim it.

Now obviously this support isn’t going to come from the U.S. or any NATO country, but there are a number of nations who have a strategic interest in preventing another regime change and chaotic aftermath. If these countries respond promptly, as in right now, they could preempt a U.S. intervention, and as long this support does not include the presence of foreign troops, doing so will greatly reduce the likelihood of a major confrontation down the road.

  1. The U.S. government and its allies should should be aggressively condemned for their failed regime change policies and the individuals behind these decisions should be charged for war crimes. This would have to be done on an nation by nation level since the U.N. has done nothing but enable NATO aggression. While this may not immediately result in these criminals being arrested, it would send a message. This can be done. Malaysia has already proven this by convicting the Bush administration of war crimes in abstentia.

Now you might be thinking: “This all sounds fine and good, but what does this have to do with me? I can’t influence this situation.”

That perspective is quite common, and for most people, it’s paralyzing, but the truth of the matter is that we can influence this. We’ve done it before, and we can do it again.

I’ll be honest with you though, this isn’t going to be easy. To succeed we have to start thinking strategically. Like it or not, this is a chess game. If we really want to rock the boat, we have to start reaching out to people in positions of influence. This can mean talking to broadcasters at your local radio station, news paper, or t.v. station, or it can mean contacting influential bloggers, celebrities, business figures or government officials. Reaching out to current serving military and young people who may be considering joining up is also important. But even if it’s just your neighbor, or your coworker, every single person we can reach brings us closer to critical mass. The most important step is to start trying.

If you are confused about why this is all happening, watch this video we put out on September 11th, 2012

If this message resonates with you then spread it. If you want to see the BIG picture, and trust me we’ve got some very interesting reports coming, subscribe to StormCloudsGathering on Youtube, and follow us on Facebook, twitter and Google plus.

BONUS ARTICLE (an interesting tangent): Were the Libyan rebels being led by a CIA plant?


[Update February 11th] They are using an incremental approach to the Syrian war to avoid backlash. Obama is now seeking an authorization for the use of military force (AUMF) to expand the use of ground troops in Syria. The mainstream media is providing him cover by focusing on the claim that the use of such troops will be “limited”.

They fail to mention that “limited” in corporate/government double speak actually translates into an authorization for small scale ground invasions all over the planet.

According to Bloomberg, these “limited” troops would be comprised of “advisers, special operations forces, Joint Terminal Attack Controllers to assist U.S. air strikes and Combat Search and Rescue personnel.” Also “There are no geographic limitations, so the administration would be free to expand the war to other countries.”

 

 

 

Accordding to ziocon’s destabilization plan  Foundation of so called Kurdistan Sunnistan and Shiaistan for create conflict in Iraq Syria and Turkey for bleed power of middle eastern nation and protection of anti christ zionist regime

 

 

 

 

 

 

This video simply explkains role of Zionist regime in the Syrian Civil War but we cant say “civil war” because most of the terrorist coming from outside  Syria.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uk5bbE04Rug

A Not So Slow Genocide

A general view of Gaza City after last conflict between Israel and Hamas.

While the world is appropriately focused on the massive humanitarian crises in places like Syria and Mosul and South Sudan, two million Gazans face a growing manmade disaster that is largely invisible. After 50 years of occupation, a decade of strangulating siege, and multiple high and low-intensity Israeli assaults on an almost daily basis, a power struggle between Hamas and Fatah, aided and abetted by the Israeli government, now threatens the very lives of these beleaguered people.

The longterm Israeli policy of severe restrictions and closure is being exacerbated by a cynical manipulation between Hamas and the Palestinian Authority which has resulted in a 40% reduction in the already limited supply of electricity by Israel. This comes on top of a dramatic 30-50% cutback of salaries for the estimated 58,000 PA civil society workers in Gaza who were ordered to stop work in 2007 when Hamas came to power while continuing to receive their salaries. In Gaza, unemployment rates of 44% are already among the highest worldwide with rates up to 60% among educated youth, a number that will only rise with the loss of salaries.

These facts and the ensuing health risks are mind numbing. There are deficiencies of essential medications, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and sewage treatment. In the midst of the hot summer months, most Gazans are receiving erratic electricity two to six hours per day and water six to eight hours every four days while desalination plants are functioning at 15% capacity. The UN reports that 34% of essential drugs at the Central Drug Store in Gaza are out of stock. 186 critical facilities providing health, water, and sanitation, and solid waste collection services are being supported by emergency fuel delivered by the UN reserves which are expected to last until October. More than 108 million liters of untreated sewage is flowing into the Mediterranean daily due to electricity and fuel shortages, and the damage to infrastructure from recent wars.

While permits to leave Gaza for medical care have been severely restricted for years and sometimes available only through collaboration, the referrals of hundreds of patients for medical treatment outside Gaza have been disrupted since March 2017, following the PA’s apparent suspension of its payments for this service. Operating on largely backup generators, medical facilities are facing an imminent lack of fuel and thus only critical surgeries and emergency services are being provided.

There are cutbacks on sanitation and sterilization of equipment, patients are being discharged prematurely from hospitals, and essential machinery such as neonatal incubators, ventilators, imaging and dialysis machines are breaking down as a result of frequent, intermittent power outages as well as the lack of maintenance and replacement parts. Health care has also suffered from years of de-development and restrictions on professional training outside the Strip, as well as direct targeting of infrastructure by the Israeli military during the war.

Visiting Gaza as a physician in 2015 and 2017 made these statistics tangible. What this means in real life is that computer work, answering emails, taking exams, refrigerating food or medications, running dialysis machines or respirators, cooking dinner, cleaning, and a thousand things that 21st-century people expect to be able to do are now not reliably expectable. There are reportedly only two functioning mammograms; women with breast cancer are routinely treated with mastectomy due to the lack of other options. There is no plastic surgery, lumpectomy and radiation are not available. Gazan women with breast cancer are dying at two to three times the rates of women receiving first world care.

What this also means is that the shortage of power and fuel to operate water and wastewater treatment facilities and the subsequent reduction in access increase the risk of waterborne diseases. The limitations on water pumps and desalination plants have led to a decrease in water consumption and standards of hygiene. The decrease in sewage treatment has led to increased pollution along the Gaza coast (which by the way, does flow north to Israel) and an increased risk of sewage back flowing onto streets, creating additional flooding, displacement, and disease.

There are also the psychological costs to living in this environment. In January 2017, Dr. Yasser Abu Jamea, executive director of the Gaza Community Mental Health Program, noted that patients treated for PTSD post one war easily relapse with the first reminders of bombing in the next war. Children who were doing well are suddenly bedwetting again and waking screaming in the night. The cues for the traumatic events are everywhere and can trigger trauma that goes back to the occupation in 1967. He calls this “delayed onset PTSD.” The war in 2014 was the worst and was experienced by a population with an accumulation of traumatic events and an inability to escape the war which has been continuously present. Patients talked of reliving traumas back to 1948.

A Gazan human rights worker said to me, “It is not burning us out. What burns us out is the repetition of what we are doing, the endless journey, never, never the last round. Either by the Israeli bulldozers, the lack of coordination with Ramallah, the mission is never accomplished. People are suffering from food insecurity; they can’t access their land. If they do, they can’t access resources. If they do, then there are land restrictions and they are afraid of rockets. If they do, they are not sure if the harvest will be a good profit at a local market because Israel will not allow the food to go outside. It is endless.

“That is the source of our frustration. We should have burnt out a long time ago. We believe the people in Gaza deserve that we just keep working to keep them standing. In Gaza, we [UN] are supporting 1.3 million people.”

The right to health requires a functional health care system and public health infrastructure and is internationally recognized as the responsibility of the occupying power, Israel. The power battle between Hamas and Fatah is also unconscionable and undoubtedly manipulated by powerful outside forces as well as internal dysfunction. The steady deterioration of the lives of the people in Gaza in the face of occupation, siege, internal discord, and the willful blindness of the international community can only be described as a not so slow genocide that is obvious to anyone who chooses to see.

Son dakika… Konya’da çatışma: 5 IŞİD’li öldürüldü

Konya’da polisin terör örgütü IŞİD’in hücre evine düzenlediği operasyonda çıkan çatışmada 5 terörist etkisiz hale getirildi, 4 Özel Harekat polisi mermi sıyrıkları sonucu hafif yaralandı.

07:5612 Temmuz 2017
Son dakika… Konya’da çatışma: 5 IŞİD’li öldürüldü

Olay, bugün saat 05.15 sıralarında merkez Meram İlçesi Yorgancı Mahallesi Dudlukır Mevkii’nde meydana geldi.

Konya Emniyet Müdürlüğü Terörle Mücadelesi Şubesi ekipleri, eylem hazırlığında olduğu belirtilen terör örgütü IŞİD’e yönelik operasyon düzenlendi.

ÇATIŞMA VİLLADA ÇIKTI

Özel Harekat polisi eşliğinde daha önce belirlenen 10 adrese yapılan baskında Yorgancı Mahallesi’ndeki bir villadaki örgütün hücre evinde çatışma çıktı. Çıkan çatışmada 1 terörist evin bahçesinde, 2’si çatı katında, 2’si de zemin katta öldürüldü.

4 Özel Harekat polisi mermi sıyrıkları sonucu hafif yaralandı.

Yaralı polisler ambulansla Konya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi’ne kaldırıldı.

konya-catisma-880

Çatışmanın olduğu bölgedeki tüm bağlantılı sokak ve caddeler trafiğe kapandı. O bölgeye yaklaşan araçlar durdurulup arandı. Yaklaşık 2.5 saat süren operasyonun ardından hücre evinde yapılan ilk aramada 1 adet tabanca 5 adet Kaleşnikof ve bu silahlara ait mermiler ele geçirildi.

Diğer hücre evlerine yapılan baskında teröristlerin gözaltına alınma işlemlerinin sürdüğü belirtildi.

Operasyon boyunca çevredeki tüm yollar kapatıldı.

Operasyon boyunca çevredeki tüm yollar kapatıldı.

EMNİYET MÜDÜRÜ: ALINLARINIZDAN ÖPÜYORUM

Çatışmanın sona ermesinin ardından Konya İl Emniyet Müdürü Şükrü Yaman, telsizden operasyona katılan polislere teşekkür edip, “Operasyonda görev alan tüm silah arkadaşlarıma geçmiş olsun diyor, tebrik ediyor, alınlarından öpüyorum. Allah devletimizi, milletimizi her türlü musibetten korusun, ayrıca yaralı arkadaşlarımıza da acil şifalar diliyorum” dedi.

Turkiye ve bolgenin Genel Sorunlari ve Cozum Onerileri

 

Soruriye’de yasanan son gelismelerle beraber olaylar sadece terror orgutlerine karsi olan bir savas olmaktan cikmis uluslar arasi boyutta Abd,Rusya,Iran ,Suudi Arabistan,Urdun,Israil ve Turkiye olarak bolgeden olan olmayan kim varsa Suriye’ye dogrudan ya da dolaylı olarak bir sekilde mudahil olmustur.

Ilk basta Katar gazinin Suriye uzerinden Avrupa’ya tasinmasi icin onerilen porojeyi Esay yonetiminin onaylamamasi (1) sonucu Katar-Suud ittifakinin Abd ve Cia destegiyle Suriye’deki cihatci gruplari harekete gecirmesiyle baslayan Suriye ic savasi sureci bugun bambaşka bir hal almis Katar-Suud ittifaki yikilmis yerine farkli cepheler olusmustur bir baska deyisle eski dostlar dusman ,dusmanlarsa dost olmustur .Katar’a Iran ve Rusya’ya yakinlasmis akrabalik iliskileri olan yakin mutefiikki Suudi Arabistan’dansa uzaklasmistir bununla beraber Trump’in Katar’a yonelik tum suclamalarina ragmen Amerika’dan tam olarak uzaklasmamis silah ticareti jet alimi vb. iliskilerse devam etmistir.

Libya’daki oldugu gibi bir senaryo Suriye’de de Cia ve Israel tarafindan uygulamaya konulmus fakat gerek Iran’in erken mudahalesi gerekse de Rusya’nin Akdeniz’deki son ustunu kaybetmek istemesi ve cihatci/takfirci grouplarla olan savasini kendi topraklarinda degil ortadoguda yokederek savasi kendi bolgelerinden uzak tutmak istmesi nedeniyle bugun Suriye’deki Neocon-siyonist(Ziocon) plani tam olarak isletilemistir (3)

 

 

1-https://twitter.com/SenRichardBlack/status/850066198461022210

2-

3-https://twitter.com/alexissss1979/status/884408223234740225

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/why-trumps-un-ambassador-nikki-haley-is-dangerous/

 

 

Buyuk Ortadogu Projesi ve Sozde Arap Baharı ve Turkiye’ye Etkileri

Sozde Arap Bahari   

Abd’nin Malezya eski buyukelcisi ve zioneocon Norton Abromowitzh’in dedigi gibi Ortadogu’da Sovyet musterisi Arap rejimlerinin yikilmasi sureci olan sozde devrim dalgasinin ilk magduru Libya olmustu Abd destekli Al Kaide ve Oso benzeri cihatci gruplarin destegiyle Kaddafi devrilmis nerden ciktigi belli olmayan yesil bayraklar ortaya cikmisti .

 

Statement for Barbaric Terror Attacks in London and allover the World

First off all our heart and our pray for innocent victims and victim families and innocent people of London.Our thoughts are with the families and friends of those who have martyed and many who have been injured .Today,we will all grieve for their loss

 

We strongly condem Isis,Al Qaeda Al Nusra Pyd and Pkk and terrorism supporter governments UK,Usa and Israel.For the Comprensively fightb aganist terrorism we need to know who

Because everbody knows who behind Isis and other terrorists organisations.If we take

a look at history we could see reaoson of terrorism.In 1970s Al Qaeda founded by Cia and

Saudis for aganist Soviet Union and 1990s Al Qaeda turned into monster for allover the world countries.And nearly recent  ten years some of AQ members joined Isis and Isis used by UK and USA governments aganist Colonel Ghaddafi for destabization of Middleeast and Zionist occupation regime.

Some of the west countries still supoortting Al Qaeda linked FSA Jihadist terror groups and in same time they supporttin Marxist PYD/PKK terrorist organisations.(1)(2)

According to us no difference between Al Qaeda and Marxist terror groups we need to stand aganist all kind off terror organisations and state terrorism.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Referances:

1-http://aa.com.tr/en/turkey/us-resupplies-pkk-pyd-terrorists-in-northern-syria/833501

2-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5bNlQYqnjg

3-https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/871177044847185920

4-https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/871177044847185920

Effect of UK Elections For Turkey and Middleeast Region

Ladies and jentilmans thanks for join us thanks for give an opportunity to give us to speech.We’re going to talk abot last developments.

United Kingdom have an important strategic position on the world politics and economy because that 2017 UK elections results would effect many countries what you live .

Two main party in UK are Conservatives led Therassa May,Labour Jeremmy Corby and others Greens and Farage’s natioalist party (I forgeted their names we will check after from internet)

In the period of Prime Minister Therasa May, Two faced Uk goverment negosiating with TR goverment but other hand UK secretly arming and training militans groups in Syria

For the remembrance in 1970s UK supportted Al Qaeda aganist Soviets in Afganistan

References:

1-https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/28/theresa-may-signs-100m-fighter-jet-deal-with-turkeys-erdogan

2-http://www.labour.org.uk/page/-/Images/manifesto-2017/labour-manifesto-2017.pdf

Labour party manifest for elections

3-https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmfaff/615/61509.htm

Uk parliament statement about syria and terrorist groups

4-http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35541003#

5-http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2017/06/03/524014/UK-May-Corbyn-general-election

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑